One of the important reminders for me: What makes us different? The curriculum had to be expanded; offer more challenges in thinking, in creativity, and scope. We early arts team members were encouraged to meet, to discuss and to continue writing a more engaging / challenging curriculum that would be interesting and inspiring. We had Vice-Principals complete some fine work in this area. The Administration vision would change from year-to-year. In some years, each Vice-Principal would be given one arts area to lead; In some years, one Vice-Principal would be in charge of the entire RAP program. You see, we did not know what would work best. We learned quickly that the entire portfolio of RAP under one Vice Principal was too much work. In the early years, our school was granted an additional Vice-Principal position. These were the best years, in my opinion, because, the additional position offered flexibility, time, and more. There were so many forms to develop: a form for RAP expenses; a form for discipline of RAP students; a form for guest artists; aa package for auditions (including photos, written requirements, test pieces, and more), etc.
It was challenging to stay on top of everything. For example, in music, we offered private lessons (weekly) to those students interested. Then, the festivals, excursions, partnerships, performances, open houses (two: one for RAP, one for Comprehensive), fund raising events, musicals, liturgical celebrations (we even offered a religious / music credit that Michelle J. co-wrote the curriculum, with our school choir singing at St. Michaels Cathedral on many Sunday mornings!), preparing for auditions, and more. Our curriculum would include all these special additions. Each partnerships required attention, performance preparation responsibilities, project requirements! Then, of course, we needed to articulate our needs for examination preparation, that there were written and performance features to our special programming. In addition, we were required to make use of the Theatre. We had to be different, and the curriculum had to be advanced, because we were auditioning the best - right?
What were the expectations for grade 9 RAP student? By year end, what accomplishments? What performances? What were the expectations for marks, the average? in order to stay in the program? We would need to meet to discuss so many important details and of course this would take time to hear different ideas. How much would it cost to deliver the type of curriculum we were developing? How did we know it would work? As a teacher, it was challenging to organize appropriate time to each project, while delivering a strong and unique curriculum. We kept revising and growing, adding more and more to our individual programs. We did get opportunities arranged to visit other programs offered in other school boards, offering similar programs, to witness best practices. These visits were eye-opening, because these programs had been in existence for a long time; established and popular. For example, Unionville High School was running successful arts programs for years. After these initial visits to visit other programs, the teachers were no longer invited, and the Administrative Vice-Principal in charge of the RAP portfolio would arrange a visit, accompanied usually by Anne Carey. Then, upon return to our school, there would be some sharing. It cost a lot to release all the arts teachers, so we had to be careful. But, we did get support to visit other programs, if we would take the initiative to arrange. Most team members were inconsistent with their effort to visit other programs to gain ideas, make connections and bring back interesting sharing of day-to-day operations. I was always an advocate of getting our team members additional training in curriculum writing; additional training in developing skills in their specialized area of the arts, etc. I encouraged the team members to join organizations and attend conferences. I valued the OMEA and attended conferences annually. Some arts teachers would attend a conference here or there, but most team members resisted due to costs involved. I believed that attending these conferences, visiting other programs, arranging partnerships, seeking professional advice and improving skills, would help us to develop a successful curriculum. How much theory? How much performance? How many trips? How were RAP students going to manage a heavy Arts curriculum with the other subject areas? We needed to be sensitive to the students as well, to balance the pressure of all the extra projects and work placed on them to produce high quality work, that was professional, responsible and appropriate. It was not easy. Many other teachers would share concerns with us and the school Administration that students and parents were concerned about the added load.
I think that all partners were a bit unrealistic. But, we kept at it, revising, trying to find the right balance for health and safety of our students and our specialized programming.
For me, it was a lot of work, but I did really, over-all, enjoy the challenges. All this work with curriculum required time and thinking; trial and error; research and discovery. I think we should be proud of our accomplishments.